Not a Lexis Advance subscriber? Try it out for free. Several years after the named plaintiffs, acting on behalf of a class of present and former African-American employees at a paper mill, brought an action in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina against Pqper employer and the plant employees' labor union to obtain a permanent injunction against any policy, practice, custom, or usage at the plant that violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act ofthe named plaintiffs asserted a class demand for backpay, even though they had given assurances at the institution of the action that backpay was not sought.

The district court also denied Wiik pre-employment testing. The court of appeals reversed, ruling that backpay should have been awarded and testing enjoined. Did it also err in Companj decision to Wuki enjoining pre-employment testing? The Supreme Court of the United States held that b ackpay should have been denied only for reasons that would not frustrate Title VII's purposes of eradicating discrimination and making victims whole.

The Court found that petitioners' lack of bad faith was not sufficient reason for denying backpay. Legislative intent was to model Title VII on the labor law rule that a finding of discriminatory discharge presumptively proves that back pay is owed. The Court also remanded for Albemarle Paper Company V Moody Wiki of whether criteria considered in pre-employment tests Albemsrle sufficiently related to petitioner's legitimate interest in job-specific ability to justify Mood testing system with a Albemarle Paper Company V Moody Wiki discriminatory impact.

Title VII forbids the use of employment tests that are discriminatory in effect unless the employer meets the burden of showing that any given requirement has a manifest relationship to the employment in question. Moody - U. Facts: Several years after the named plaintiffs, acting on Mood of a class of present and former African-American employees at a paper mill, brought an action in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina Pensacola Sign Company their employer and the plant employees' labor union to obtain a permanent injunction against any policy, practice, custom, or usage at the plant that violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act ofthe named plaintiffs asserted a class demand for backpay, even though they had given assurances at the institution of the action that backpay was not sought.

Alhemarle for other Case Briefs.

{{meta.fullTitle}}

The respondents represent a class of current and past employees of the Albemarle Paper Co. paper mill in Roanoke Rapids, North Carolina, who claimed to have suffered from racially discriminatory hiring and promoting practices. In 1966, after filing a race discrimination complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the ...…

List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 422 ...

List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 422 ... Jump to navigation Jump to search. This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court cases from volume 422 of the United States Reports: Intercounty Constr. Corp. v. Walter, 422 U.S. 1 (1975) ... Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody, 422 U.S. 405 (1975) Muniz v. Hoffman, 422 U.S. 454 (1975)…

Albemarle Paper Company v. Moody - Case Brief

Audio Transcription for Opinion Announcement - June 25, 1975 in Albemarle Paper Company v. Moody Warren E. Burger: The judgment and opinion of the Court in 74-389, Albemarle Paper Company against Moody, and 74-428, a consolidated case, Halifax Local against Moody will be announced by Mr. Justice Stewart. Potter Stewart:…

Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody - Oxford Reference

The plaintiffs in Moody consisted of present and former African-American employees of Albemarle Paper Company's mill in Roanoke Rapids, North Carolina. They charged that the company's seniority system perpetuated the overt segregation that existed in the plant's departmental job assignment system prior to 2 July 1965 (the effective date of ...…